22 April 2009
20 April 2009
19 April 2009
The Plan (pt 2)
This is some more thinking to myself, you might want to avoid it if you're looking for something non-personal
Ok, so the tentative plan is to wait until May 1 here, and if a job doesn’t call, then I’m taking off back to Norman. If a job does call, I’ll do the interview, and see where it goes from there. I’ve decided that I want to be a teacher. Right now, I’m leaning towards teaching mathematics, because I think those are in demand, and because I want to learn more mathematics. I just got as far as the college algebra class, and think it would be useful to get more knowledge, and plus, it would help out if I decided to pursue economics, since a lot of it is mathematical and formulaic.
I could also do English, or Social Studies, but I’m leaning towards mathematics because of the demand. Science is also in demand, but my interest in that isn’t too big. I’m interested in these subjects: government and politics, philosophy, arts and culture, economics, history. Since math teachers are needed, that seems to be the closest thing to one of my subjects. Although in this economic climate, I’m not sure if teachers are needed as much.
Continuing on the plan, I’d like to find a job as soon as possible in OK, and hopefully we can find a place to live. I’d like to go back to school to take those classes I need in order to get certified to teach math. Maybe I can get another degree while getting those classes I need, but if not, I can do a masters later on, while I’m teaching.
I don’t know when I’d be going back to school though. I’d have to figure out when I can enroll, which classes I need to take in order to go through the teaching certification process, and how I’d pay for those classes. FAFSA, as complicated and timely it is, is still an option. I’d also look into scholarships or any other help I can get. The second time around, I would hope I can do things differently, with more knowledge under my belt.
BUT if I get a job offer here, then I think I’m going to take it. This would complicate things though. First of all, I’d have to wait a year (maybe more, maybe less) to be considered a resident of NJ. The reason I’d want to wait is because it would cost thousands of dollars more if I paid as an out of state student (to take those classes I need to get certified). Second of all, and this is a problem I’d face in OK also, working full time and going to school would be difficult, and I’d be afraid it’d lessen my chances at becoming a teacher. While I was working for the philosophy degree, I just worked part time, but the jobs that I have applied to here have been full time jobs. The upside is that NJ is one of the highest paying states for teachers. The downside is that it’s also one of the most expensive states to live in.
One other path I can take is moving to OK, working, and using that to transition to Texas. Actually, that is the current plan. I’d rather teach in Texas than in Oklahoma, because Oklahoma doesn’t pay teachers well from what I’ve heard and read. The other path would be working in OK, not going back to school, and do an alternative certification program in TX where all one needs is a bachelor’s degree. So for that program, I’m all set. I would like to take more classes in mathematics though, for the sake of getting a firmer grasp on the subject, and to be a better math teacher than I would be if I didn’t take the classes.
So that’s the plan. Now I just wait until May 1, and if nothing happens with the jobs I’ve applied to, then I’m taking off to Norman. This is the short(er) term plan.
Maybe sometime in the distant future, while I’m teaching, I can work on a master’s or doctorate in order to teach at the university level. But that’s for another time. For now, I wait.
16 April 2009
15 April 2009
Albums and Tea Parties
I've been listening to these albums lately
Pink Floyd- Animals
The Beatles- Rubber Soul; Revolver
Bon Iver- For Emma, Forever Ago
Amesoeurs- Amesoeurs
Bjork- Homogenic
Mono- Hymn to the Immortal Wind
Samantha Crain and the Midnight Shivers- The Confiscation
Ulver- Perdition City
Also, what is up with these "tea parties" that are going on around the country? They're protesting bailouts and all the government spending, but where were they one year ago, when Bush was doing all this? After all, it was him that gave the banks the first half of the bailout money, and without much regulation on what the banks could do with it. And now where has the money gone? We don't know! Where were the protesters for the past, oh I don't know, 50+ years, since the US has been grossly outspending other nations (almost the rest of the world COMBINED!) in military spending? And now they're talking about spending, and even the loss of civil liberties. They should have been talking about this when Bush was in office; he was the one that took the liberties away after all. If I remember correctly, they were supporting the patriot act. They were saying that it would keep America safer.
Well they won't get support from me today. No, I'm afraid these tea parties have a concealed agenda. Fox news has been a major proponent of these parties, while at the same calling them "grass roots." Sorry, but Glenn Beck (and other fox cronies) using his show on faux news to call for tea parties and revolution is not grass roots. These tea parties are partisan. Now they raise their voices, only after a democrat has been elected into office. This is too little, too late, and more importantly, for the wrong reasons.
-Leo
14 April 2009
Seriously?
"Pro-Pesticide Group Criticizes First Lady’s Organic Garden
And First Lady Michelle Obama is coming under criticism from a pro-pesticide industry group for deciding to plant an organic garden at the White House. The Mid America CropLife Association recently wrote to the First Lady to urge her to consider using pesticides, or what they call "crop protection products.” One official with the pro-pesticide group said, “While a garden is a great idea, the thought of it being organic made [us] shudder.” Mid America CropLife represents agribusinesses like Monsanto, Dow AgroSciences and DuPont."
New Yawk
13 April 2009
Plan of Action
I was in deep thought in bed, which was preventing me from sleeping. So instead, I decided to get out of bed, and think sitting down, listening to Pink Floyd’s Animals. The topic: My future.
So I thought about being a writer and basically being poor (it seems I’m going to be poor in any of the situations I’ve thought of so far). This route would require a lot of determination to write, and not just my own thoughts, but writing what people want to read. I’d have to read instructional books about how to write scripts, stories, maybe pay for some classes, keep up on politics (that’s what people read about), and maybe write some stuff I don’t want to write (I hear many writers go into pornography).
But then I thought, “But I can write AND have another job.” So then I thought about what the other job would be, and teaching came to mind. For some reason teaching always comes to mind first; I think the reason may be because every time I’ve been asked “what do you want to do with that (philosophy degree)?” the natural answer seems to be teach. After all, isn’t that what philosophers do, teach? I’m sure there are others who specialized in something else; some famous ones come to mind, including Locke (statesman), Leibniz (physicist), and Aristotle (everything else). I on the other hand, didn’t study physics (one class actually, Philosophical issues in Physics and Cosmology!), didn’t study politics (well, maybe a couple of political classes). Ok, so I took a little bit of everything, and didn’t specialize in anything in particular.
Therein lies the problem though; since I only took a little bit of everything, I don’t have the skills required to apply for a job as, well, anything. I didn’t take enough credits in anything to teach it, and since philosophy isn’t taught in elementary school (to my knowledge), let alone high school, I can’t teach right now. I’d have to go back to school and take the classes I need, unless I go to Texas and go through an alternative certification program. I’ve written about why employers won’t hire me these days, so no need to go over that again.
Back to the future. I thought about working in a restaurant also. I know restaurants, and I don’t mind working an easy job like that, as long as I’m working with people I can get along with. The drawback was that it doesn’t seem like it’d be high paying. But then again, like I said before, I don’t think I’ll be getting a high paying job any time soon, maybe not any time ever. I’ve applied at banks, I don’t know why though. Hmm... No, I can’t think of a reason I applied there besides needing a job. In two applications from different banks, I had to fill out an online questionnaire. In both, I got an automatic reply that I wasn’t what they were looking for. Other banks just haven’t replied. So I don’t think I’m qualified to work at a bank for some reason. Or maybe there are better people they can hire, especially these days when they have to be picky.
Another route I can take, that was recommended, was social work. This one seems like it’d be up my ally, except I don’t know areas of social work nor what they do. I know that I’d have to go back to college and get a master’s in social work. I know that one area is health, or something along those lines (public health maybe?), and that social workers help people out. So if I went down that route, I’d have to research what areas there are, and study up on it. Although, I don’t know if I’d be able to get into graduate school since I didn’t major in social work, and don’t know much about it. This path seems less likely; let’s say a 3 or 4 on a scale of 1-10 of likely paths I would take.
I’ve thought about being a paralegal, because law is also another field philosophy majors go into. Another problem here (what’s new?) though. I don’t have any experience in law (except for one class, again with the one class). I applied at some places, because the requirements were general; one just had to have a bachelors. But I didn’t match their “preferred” qualities, I guess, which would be experience, a degree in paralegal studies, etc...
OK, I just realized I haven’t been doing much thinking about the future, just about what I’ve faced until now. So, once again, I’m going to try to go back to the future. So far teaching and restaurant are the two more likely options. I could go back to school for something else, say economics to work in a bank, or paralegal studies (or law would also work) to work as a paralegal. After thinking about it though, I don’t think I’d want to work at a bank. I mean, I could do it, because I’m good at math, I just think that would be further down the list of possible jobs.
I just ran into another question. Should I try to go into a career where I would earn more money, even if it’s not as interesting? Hmm...Well, I have a lot of money in student loans to pay off. At the same time, do I really want to get stuck in a job I don’t care for? I mean, working at a bank doesn’t exactly sound like my bag of chips; counting money all day, balancing numbers, being indoors. Unless it was dynamic and exciting! Maybe I could make it dynamic and exciting! Eh (btw, now I’m listening to the album Wish You Were Here). I looked into financial analysis. They seem to have a dynamic job (especially right now), since the economy seems to change a lot, and they have to deal with different types of customers and businesses, and they have to keep up with current trends in the market. But something about that repels me a little; I guess the idea of being part of “the machine.” Do I want to work for the same people who got us into this economic mess?
That’s another question I have to answer. Would I be willing to conform? I guess I’d have to. It doesn’t seem like I can avoid it. I can be more careful, maybe. Like I could try to stay away from financial institutions, but it doesn’t seem likely that I can avoid them altogether. I guess that’s like with any other corporation though. Take this macbook I’m using, for instance. It’s made by the Apple corporation. I own other things that were probably made by corporations, possibly not all responsible. So I guess the best path would be to do whatever I can do, up to a point, that point being when I need a job, or need a cheap coat, or some other thing.
Ok, so I think that answers that question. If I need to work for a big company, then I might as well take that opportunity. Ooh! I like economics! I could study that if I went back to school. The question is, what would I do with a degree in economics? What exactly does an economist do? This seems like the same “like” that I have for other subjects though; politics, education, government, etc... In other words, things that I like, but don’t have enough experience in, but wouldn’t mind going back to school for. Man, deciding what I want to do for the rest of my life is hard. Writing seems to be the only constant, but it’s not writing that will make any money.
It’s getting late, and I don’t want to wake up late tomorrow. But I have to get this “rest of my life” business over with soon. Time is running out. Well, time isn’t running out. Money is running out, the money I have saved up, that is. I have loan bills to pay. So here’s an idea, a tentative one though, since I’ll continue thinking tomorrow; I should just find any ol’ job, restaurant, department store, whatever, until I decide what I want to do. That is, while I’m working, I’m paying bills, living in an apartment, and deciding what I would like to do after that. I’ll work off this idea when I wake up (I hope I can go to sleep), and decide where would be the best place to work. In order to do that, I’d have to decide where I’d want to work. In order to decide where I want to work, I’d have to decide what career I want. Damn, a vicious cycle. I have to decide on one thing for the rest to fall in place. Never mind that though, I’ll continue on this when I wake up!
-Leo
11 April 2009
The Cave
Contemplating
Things don’t always turn out how one hopes they would. In my case, things have not gone so well here in New Jersey. I’m sure much it is due to my own shortcomings. I thought I would come here and find a job that’s not fast food or Walmart, but that has not happened. Who would hire a philosophy graduate in an economy like this anyway? When many are losing their jobs, there is likely to be more competition for what few jobs there are. When many others have technical skills that I lack, employers will most likely hire them first. So this wasn’t exactly what I had in mind when moving.
Where do I find myself now? Still without friends here, still without a job, and contemplating my next move. I’m deciding whether to move back to Norman or not. I have a place to stay there with friends until I’d find a job. My mentality is that if I’m going to work in a restaurant or something, why do it where I don’t know anyone? Wouldn’t it be better to work in a low paying job where one has friends at least? So that’s what I’m currently debating.
But I think there is a cloud looming over me that is even more ominous; the metaphorical cloud of uncertainty! Dramatic, right? I don’t know where I see myself in 5 years. Heck, I don’t know where I see myself in 6 months! And I have a plan to find a teaching job (which I’d have to go back to school for, to get credits in whatever subject I’d teach), but even that I’m not sure of. That’s the same way I entered college; uncertain. I went in not knowing what to study, switched majors 3 times, and settled on philosophy on the third time. I don’t know if “settled” is the right word. I was happy studying it, because it’s in my nature to be thoughtful (more thoughtful than I should be). But since I didn’t know what I was doing, I left with no technical skills, a lot of money in loans, and no idea of what to do next. Teaching just seems like the better (not best) thing to do, because education is something I care about. But I’m not sure about teaching either. Just because I care about education, does that mean I should be a teacher? I care about the economy too. I care about government and politics. It just seems like I’m pushing myself along a path because I don’t know what else to do.
My solution to things has always been to think about it. Contemplate until the path seems clear. But in this case, I don’t think I even know where to start thinking! I’m confused, is what I’m saying. My only solution right now is to keep thinking. It is to be hoped that this method will work, as it has in the past.
09 April 2009
New look
08 April 2009
Amesoeurs

I don’t do music reviews as much as I used to, but I’m going to try to start again. Hopefully it will strengthen my writing skills, and show me how to be a better music critic.
So, right now I’m listening to Amesoeurs newest self titled album. I wouldn’t consider myself a fan of new wave, but strangely this album has grown on me. I’m not saying it’s a new wave album, but there are new wave songs on here, mixed with some post rock, extreme metal, and a bit of industrial. Overall, the album gives a sense of melancholy, similar to what is shown on the album cover.
The album starts out with a build up, from a repeating riff, to a post rock barrage of sound, mixed with industrial elements. The second track is what really sets the tone for the rest of the album. Les Ruches Malades is one of the new wave songs I was talking about. While this song isn’t pulled straight out of the 70s or 80s, it will definitely remind some of the same sounds that became so popular during those decades. It’s not a bad track. It’s actually growing on me, and I can see myself giving this repeat listens in the future. The next track, Heurt, is a bit heavier, bringing to mind some of the alternative rock that came out of the early 90s; actually I was reminded of Smashing Pumpkins while listening to this, with its heavy riffs and soft interludes. So this track is one of the better ones, in my opinion.
Recueillement, the fourth song, starts out with a doomy riff. The vocals here, unlike the previous two, are not just female vocals. Instead, they mix more harsh vocals with a little bit of female vocals, which fits perfectly with the doom metal sound of the song. The heavy part then flows into a soft melody, before ending with a variant on the heavy riff. This song is one of my favorites on the album; from the moment the song begins, to when the vocals kick in, you can tell it’s one of the more emotional pieces on here. Track five, Faux Semblants, takes us back into new wave territory. While not being a standout track, its simplicity does not take away from the album, and fits in with the melancholy theme of the album well.
Then we are treated to a piano interlude, that is drowned in reverb. OK, so drowned is probably not the best word, since the music is still important, but here it’s the atmosphere that really stands out, a bleak atmosphere evocative of the album cover. From here, the album takes a complete 180, when the next song begins with an extreme metal sound. Track 7 is definitely the heaviest track on the album, from its harsh vocals to its frantic speed. It doesn’t completely stick out like a sore thumb though. It ends with industrial sounds and scratches.
Video Girl and La Reine Trayeuse take us back once more to the softer sounds similar to Faux Semblants. While these may not appeal to everyone, they are no doubt solid pieces that contribute to the album’s overall sound. Only towards the end of La Reine Trayeuse does the sound change to a frenzy, replete with painful screaming and fast drum beats. The title track of the album, Amesoeurs, is one of the more upbeat ones, with a goth rock/alternative fusion. Like I said, I don’t listen to this music on a regular basis, but I can see myself listening to this in the future. The final track, Au Crepuscule de Nos Reves, doesn’t deviate from the rest of the album, as it mixes post rock and the harsh vocals we’ve heard throughout, with a soft guitar part somewhere in between. The track ends at the 5:33 mark, and then at 9:01 the album is closed with a short industrial loop. This was also one of my favorite ones on the album.
Overall this is a good record. The melancholy theme is expressed very well throughout, at times setting a bleak atmosphere for the listener. The new wave or goth rock sounds may not appeal to everyone (i.e. those expecting more extreme metal), but with an open mind, it might grown on some like it has on me.
-Leo
the joys of video chatting
06 April 2009
Why are the Beatles so popular?
Anyways, I’m reading other people’s opinions. Some say that they were just there at the right place at the right time. John Lennon championed peace when people wanted to hear about peace
, during the war in Vietnam, and people found escape in their music from the grim realities of war. Others say it was because they pushed the boundaries of rock music. Starting with Rubber Soul, when they began incorporating more psychedelic elements, and going into their landmark album Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band where they incorporated even m
ore instruments and sounds, including the sitar, harpsichord, and going so far as to include a full orchestra, not to mention Revolver or their self titled, cacophonous The Beatles (aka the White Album).
You know, I’m not quite sure yet why they are so popular. There must be something in their music that makes it timeless. Actually, I didn’t “get it” until sometime last year. Ever since then, every time I listen to one of their albums (I haven’t delved deeply into their catalogue before Rubber Soul, btw) I just hear music that will never get old. For example, I was listening to Sgt. Pepper’s while driving in my car today, and during the reprise, I found myself thinking about what I’m writing about now, that this song and others sound like they could have been written in the present time; timelessness. But that doesn’t completely capture it, because there are many timeless pop rock song
s out there, so what makes these stand out? You know, I really don’t kn
ow. Maybe a lot of it does just have to do with the name, and the marketing. At the same time, they did cover so much ground during their career, that it would seem everyone would like at least one Beatles song. So maybe the credit could be due to the wide reach of their music.
Oh well, I won’t bother my mind with pointless que
stions. Does it really matter why they are so popular? Can I not just live and enjoy the timeless music? For now I’ll continue to listen to these songs that still resonate with many, and yet have a special place carved out in my brain; a place where brain cells say, “Wow, another great Beatles song! Can these guys do any wrong?” or “Wow, did they write this song about me?” or “Damn, that song is deep,” or “hey, that’s something I never heard before!”
oh and here's some cool Simpsons pictures I found:




-Leo
04 April 2009
alright!
"'Too Big to Fail' Is Too Big- Period"
However, one way to get your bearings in this bailout blizzard is to focus on the central point that both the bailors (Washington) and the bailees (Wall Street) keep pounding as an irrefutable truth that everyone simply has to accept -- namely, the institutions being rescued are too big to fail.
-Jim Hightower (click ^ the text to read the rest of the article)